Thrombosed external hemorrhoid, frequently called TEH by medical practitioners, has long troubled mankind. Medical research has made significant breakthroughs in many areas over the last couple of hundred years. For that reason, routine and established diagnosis and therapy of TEH, generally non-life threatening, would be expected by a layperson. Quite the opposite, the reality today is that there remains several unresolved issues among experts in the TEH field. There are literally hundreds, if not thousands, of research papers offering divergent hypotheses, findings, and open-ended conclusions that only serve as a cue for further study.
Not unexpectedly, thrombosed external hemorrhoid sufferers have to contend with clashing instructions when they seek the advice of a doctor and be met with a mind-boggling range of treatment modes and medicines. The doctor’s decisions for you may well depend on the expert view that dominate current medical circles, the expert view he personally subscribes to (which may depend on how well-read he is or what specific training he has undergone for TEH) and his actual experience with the TEH patients he treats. A TEH patient can be forgiven for empathizing with the proverbial guinea pig, especially since TEH is generally seen as an ordinary ailment. It is never the intent here to cast aspersions on medical science, merely acceptance of one of those things in life, something like the common cold.
Fundamental Controversy
The primary thrombosed external hemorrhoid argument to be evaluated is its etiology (US spelling) or aetiology (US spelling), the clinical nomenclature for the causation of a disease. Sliced from any angle, controversies just do not become more foundational than this! Despite technological advances, the exact cause of TEH has not been pinpointed to date, confounded by the intricacies of the human anatomy.
The logical outcome of this is an ever-growing list of potential causal factors. Gebbensleben, Hilger and Rohde combed through 187 research papers on TEH spanning more than 40 years (Dec 1958 to Jan 2004), journal reference lists, standard textbooks and applied their own medical knowledge as practitioners before narrowing down the published etiological factors of thrombosed external hemorrhoid to 38.
From Mar 2004 to Aug 2005, the 3 TEH experts devoted themselves to an unusual prospective cohort study of 148 individuals, comprising 72 with TEH, 76 without TEH, both female and male, between the ages of 16 to 80. As suggested by its name, a prospective cohort study is forward-looking and focused on a group of people with similar characteristics (the cohort) but differing in the factors being studied. With its reliance on future events to draw conclusions, the prospective cohort study is considered superior to the retrospective version.
Thirty-eight Causal Factors
The thirty-eight etiological elements giving rise to thrombosed external hemorrhoid fingered by researchers from 1958 to 2004 can be divided into 2 batches -
(1) Diarrhea, hard bowels, use of laxatives, straining at defecation, use of shower or wet wipes after defecation, assumption to have hemorrhoids, prior anal surgery, pregnancy, menses, spicy meals, coughing, sneezing, gender, nationality, self-employed, employee, worker, housewife, sitting on cold surfaces and lifting a heavy load;
(2) use of soaps and gels after defecation, frequency of genital cleaning before sleep, use of dry toilet paper after defecation combined with wet cleaning, frequency of shower use, use of dry toilet paper only, frequency of bathtub use, ano-receptive sex, pregnancy, recent alcohol intake, excessive physical effort, sports, career as trainee, retirement, civil servant, body mass index (BMI) and age.
In spite of the inclusion of many common factors, thrombosed external hemorrhoid has insignificant statistical relation to Group 1. Statistical relationships were evident in Group 2 factors to justify further studies in the cohort of 148 subjects. Interestingly, the study concluded that of the 16 factors in Group 2, only 6 were found to predict TEH correctly.
Of the 6 factors in Group 2, the 3 found to significantly increase the risk of TEH were use of excessive physical effort, age 46 or younger and use of dry toilet paper combined with wet cleaning methods after defecation. Of the 6 Group 2 factors, the 3 most closely linked to receding risk of thrombosed external hemorrhoid include weekly cleaning of genitals before sleep, use of bathtub and use of shower.
These 6 factors, declared the researchers, must be included in studies of optimal therapy (surgical or non-surgical treatment), etiology (causes) and prophylaxis (prevention). Quite provocatively, the researchers articulated the need to distinguish fact from fiction in the evaluation of risk factors. Even so, it is believed that several, not one, factors lead to the occurrence of TEH.
Alternative Treatment
Limited in scope, a fact acceded to by the researchers, but the study serves to amplify that there may be one too many views for those seeking an answer for thrombosed external hemorrhoid. Significant lack of consensus (40 years of research, 187 papers and 38 possible causes!) among medical professionals contribute to the various explanations proffered to laypersons. No intention should be alluded here that proper medical advice is a waste of time. Nevertheless, the state of affairs indicates a need for alternative remedies to be given some weight.
An alternative remedy known as H Miracle ranks highly among TEH sufferers. Produced by an ex hemorrhoid sufferer, H Miracle has been the answer for numerous others who were willing to give alternative medicine a chance. Its natural foundation has been a source of attraction for H Miracle. Never failing to make one pause are the thrombosed external hemorrhoid sufferers validating that H Miracle is a enduring answer.
Reference:
O. Gebbensleben, Y. Hilger & H. Rohde: Etiology of thrombosed external hemorrhoids: results from a prospective cohort study. The Internet Journal of Gastroenterology. 2009 Volume 8 Number 1